Shamsher_MDI




Raja Shamsher Sen of Mandi with his lover

Mandi, c 1760-70

Size: 165 * 139 mm

Cleaveland Museum of Art

Artist: Unknown

Inscription in Takri ; Shamsher Sen

Raja Shamsher Sen of Mandi gazes intensely at a young man, his lover, who is shown greeting him with respect. Centuries away the master painter remarkably uses a lakshana of ‘Gaydar’  to convey a character’s sexual orientation.  Gaydar which is portmanteau of gay and radar is that  intuitive ability of a gay person to assess and reinforce his perception of another person’s gay identity through clues like eye gaze. Shamsher Sen loved his queens and as well as men. His persona and portraits showing him surrounded by young men with a similar eye gaze leads one to believe his desire for young men. In gaydar concept, the male gaze is further accentuated by the presence of other forms of non verbal communication such as posture, gesture and smiles etc.. The painters of Mandi have used some of these lakshnas to convey the message of homosexuality where Shamsher Sen is seen touching and gazing at a young man or dressed as a woman or even  fondling a young boy.

Shamsher Sen ruled Mandi for more than fifty years from 1727 A.D.  and was a complete contrast to Sidh Sen, his illustrious grandfather. History sees him as a man of weak intellect, barely in control of himself and with a strange look as if under the influence of opium. As he  grew up to manhood he fell more and more into the influence of men of lower position and took decisions which were just contrary to the expectations of a noble king. However, the miniature paintings from the Mandi court thrived during his reign but showed a gradual slide in quality. The portraits of Shamsher Sen signalling his sexual preference are not made in secret but appear to have been commissioned in full public view with the rulers’ patronage. They are in their own way, thus state portraits. What the painter does is to pick up on lakshanas to achieve his end of presenting a likeness that throws into relief the essence of the man rather than the accident of the appearance1. This reflects not only openness in the Society  but also the  extraordinary skill of the artist to penetrate into an uncommon subject in sexuality. The artist has been able to alert the audience  without the need to revert to stereotypes, iconography or exaggeration. This male gaze in the painting comes out as a valuable tool in normalising conveyance of homosexuality even to a heterosexual audience.

Shamsher Sen and the young man both wear a pristine white jama secured at the waist with a bright saffron sash and a stylish turban. The Dhatura flower on the turban of the King with  forehead smeared with ash and a tripundra mark on his throat all lead to his immense faith in Lord Shiva just like his grandfather. The tassel made of opaque silk handkerchief, the red garland, the gold jewellery and saffron coloured shoes all give a touch of delicacy and flamboyance to the King. The young man with his plaited long hair, light gold jewellery, fair and smooth face with sharp features, a pointed nose and thin eyebrows all bring in an air of freshness. The plain background with a blue colour and yellow border keeps the entire focus on the love gaze of the two men.

The ethos towards homosexuality in ancient India was to an extent liberal with art, sculpture and writings on the subject being open and full of confidence. It may not have been in the mainstream, but was definitely acknowledged. This only changed with the advent of the Victorian morality. After all the ancient Hindu philosophy does talk about tritiya prakriti” or “third nature”.  Men loved men in private and the persecution or the prosecution for defying the general rule was bare minimum or near to none as detailed in the 2nd century BCE treatise on statecraft, Arthashastra.  The Indian scripture on love life and sex - Kama Sutra written by  Vatsyayana about 2300 years ago gives lessons even on “auparishtaka” (oral sex) between two men. In the ninth chapter of part two of that knowledgeable Book,  Vatsyayana boldly defines eight steps for a man sucking another man’s erect penis starting from the nominal congress and moving to deep throating. The Chapter ends by Vatsyayana ‘casually’ saying “But after all, these things being done secretly.” There was no censorship!

While Shamsher Sen was enjoying his love life with  male partners in a small hill state and getting the act subtly portrayed in paintings, the Mughal Emperor Shah Alam was during the same period enjoying sex with a handsome young man named Ghulam Qadir who suffered from ubnah – an itch in his arse with the Emperor being the ‘top’ and satisfying that itch.2 Whether Shamsher Sen was a “top” or a “bottom”  with ubnah - the master painter leaves no hint and we can only speculate!

 

Pahari Masters by B.N.Goswamy and Eberhard Fischer, pp 191

The Anarchy by William Dalrymple, pg 272

 

The style of the painting belongs to the second phase of Mandi Hand paintings as discussed in my earlier blog.


The Missing Link in Pahari Paintings - Lokinder Bisht

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SidhSenSiva_MDI

Shiva_MDI20th